Sotomayor belongs to a sexist club that doesn't admit men.

If a man did the reciprocol, he would have zero chance.

But she thinks that being female and hispanic gives her special privleges.

Now, I think private clubs with apartheid rules should be completely legal. IE not a legitimate concern of the State. But the State thinks otherwise, and how can she
represent the law if she thinks she is (and her affinities are) an exception?

Judge FAIL.

So Obama proposes Sotomayor as a Supreme. Never mind she's a racist and a sexist, she's Hispanic, get it, and BO is into pandering.

More affirmative action = unfir treatment under the law, which is unconstitutional. But who needs a constitution when you have a "Latina"?

And, did she really earn a place at Yale, or was she also treated differently because of her sex and race?

---

"I would hope that a wise European American man with the richness of his experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion [as a judge] than some 'Rican chick who hasn't lived that life,"