"He is a lovely boy, very sensitive, good with animals, quiet and has a wicked sense of humour," she said.


What more can you say of someone? Really?

A hero. An AMERICAN HERO. Heh.

Not like the stupid colonial mercs.

Can you HANDLE the TRUTH, dumbshit prole americans?

Fascists.

Theist monsters.

The government is not your herdsman, you are not their livestock. The government exists only to defend you from outsiders and allow recompense and prosecutation againsty fraudulent or violent insiders. It does not exist to create jobs, occupy distant lands, entangle with foreign governments (see the opinions of G. Washinton, Genl, ret), teach, build, subsidize, regulate, etc.

Not morally, not constitutionally, not legally, not ethically.

Might may make right for a while, but bullies sleep, and glass empires shouldn't fly dfrones.

And 3e6 SIPR accounts? You've GOT to be kidding me. Secrets beyond two are not secrets.

Can't wait for a higher access level patriot with a thumb drive.

---

Everyone can publish, and republish, for free. Welcome to the 21st. And you can publish anonymously.

Kinda hard to keep secrets if both fnord parties aren't similarly motivated.

Maybe you should enjoy the sunshine.

"Whether you agree with what Julian does or not, living by what you believe in and standing up for something is a good thing."

She said Julian Assange had put his life on hold when he was just 18 to care for his newborn son, Daniel, who is now 20 and works as a software developer in the southern city of Melbourne.

"Jules put his life and university studies on hold to parent Daniel and be there for him," Christine Assange said.

"He's a very good father -- not many men of that age will fight for their kid, but he stepped up to the responsibility."


---

A hero. That simple. May Rummy, Obama, Cheney, Bush, Libby, and the rest die of rectal cancer.

And if JA is harmed, you have no idea what you're dealing with, dinosaur.

Asked what his "moral calculus" was to justify publishing the leaks and whether he considered what he was doing to be "civil disobedience," Assange said, "Not at all. This organization practices civil obedience, that is, we are an organization that tries to make the world more civil and act against abusive organizations that are pushing it in the opposite direction." As for whether WikiLeaks was breaking the law, he said, "We have now in our four-year history, and over 100 legal attacks of various kinds, been victorious in all of those matters." He added, "It's very important to remember the law is not what, not simply what, powerful people would want others to believe it is. The law is not what a general says it is. The law is not what Hillary Clinton says it is."

http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,2033771,00.html